From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Guile fails http-get because of GNUTLS
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:59:26 +0100
Message-ID: <87r2snjnap.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87tvxljdde.fsf@gmail.com>
	<16f6e47d-9e82-b4e6-b5d6-908d06aef95b@zoho.com>
Reply-To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51193)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com>) id 1eIMwZ-0003f5-Ko
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:59:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com>) id 1eIMwU-0006NA-C4
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:59:35 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]:44115)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com>)
	id 1eIMwU-0006N0-4j
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:59:30 -0500
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id r68so24860053wmr.3
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:59:29 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <16f6e47d-9e82-b4e6-b5d6-908d06aef95b@zoho.com>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

Hi Sirgazil,

sirgazil writes:

> That seems to be bug #29258:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=29258

You are correct, thank you for pointing this out!

Alex