From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#29621: Guix 0.14.0-1.ad4953b failed to build for x86_64 on Hydra Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:59:43 -0500 Message-ID: <87r2s3jt34.fsf@netris.org> References: <20171209034434.GA10093@jasmine.lan> <20171209203414.GA11256@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNpzN-0005Dl-Vh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:01:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNpzK-0003rs-Sn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:01:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNpzK-0003rk-PH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:01:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNpzK-0000kK-Fh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:01:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20171209203414.GA11256@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:34:14 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29621@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> From the log at : >> >> [...] >> FAIL: tests/guix-register.sh >> PASS: tests/guix-gc.sh >> PASS: tests/guix-daemon.sh >> ============================================================================ >> Testsuite summary for GNU Guix 0.14.0-1.ad4953b >> ============================================================================ >> # TOTAL: 747 >> # PASS: 714 >> # SKIP: 32 >> # XFAIL: 0 >> # FAIL: 1 >> # XPASS: 0 >> # ERROR: 0 >> [...] >> >> I restarted the build. > > It failed a second time :/ Unfortunately I can't reproduce it. I restarted it again. Perhaps we should modify the 'check' phase of our Guix package to print the contents of test-suite.log in case 'make check' fails. Mark