From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: bug#25296: fully functional desktop installation Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 23:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <87r2qpj70x.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20161229171045.263747a9@riseup.net> <87bmvpb21m.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7xgwom7.fsf@gnu.org> <87shb8jedn.fsf@gnu.org> <87lggzdzh9.fsf@gnu.org> <87vag2857m.fsf@gnu.org> <20180116120929.28686761@scratchpost.org> <87bmht7vmc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebhrM-00041b-6Z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 02:10:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebhrG-0007xP-DC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 02:10:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebhrG-0007xD-AQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 02:10:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebhrG-0006iO-4z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 02:10:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87bmht7vmc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:59:07 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Mathieu Lirzin , 25296@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> I'd vote for adding libreoffice and icecat to desktop.tmpl and not to gn= ome (since they are not part of the GNOME project). > > OK, why not. There=E2=80=99s still the issue that it will make download = times > and disk size requirements longer (a problem we should fix, but this > won=E2=80=99t happen overnight.) While I think it's fine to include this in the example desktop configuration file, I don't see why we couldn't have a few example configuration files for various use cases. One of those use cases could mimic what other distros normally include, like LibreOffice etc, and one of those could be a more minimal desktop environment. Does it add a maintenance burden to have multiple example desktop configuration files? =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlpe9q8ACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp2x1A//SdWwNZ0N7eNQZeTgSLzPOGoFCWQUm5lyjlSzQwYsk9kfpyseA3S/TRlD 9nYOOmj4h6Zf/udfLE4xsQsoaSFt0pG1ZGLWoLBlMKMDYun5nf5VBXMjHypAp3/2 Q95UDlXHl7OUhSz4SIlocTB2s0VqEh635hWPP3d4Sc7l7bswN/r2hCKH1RW1QAeS 4wv6HxGYyEi7yxAA0Xaa3Sn1TU2GCRMaN9L3uS3QzfFOPWvlQQWsWSIZ3zTBzR2M Mvk/qabjtbMbdXUAz+2nlZRFw4Evsi7V9V35IoZYwoptifMu6SuhlsN8rJW4FKCD CNlSWjknqn4Gr/cgum6jtZDz9Y0cxrHp8J884W04Zxd5boqJcjdk7oGnHvAgilZ/ 6C/Z9+7wFVlhCW8sffxTYoDFXsEigIsFf4YPJtZ39eqOS0hqCBD4MPwWuyrBcfV1 4L/htU/C5VTXA8esoQn8WNNUQ5VxU5iK/Rl1m9HLaLGV+uDHXhq65uQkK7QjrIyA 1FErVkn3X3S6f54ZIXCyaL7HyZtfCYPbAOIX837XE6w/BvmKWybBPrh8OrTU9QSQ m9qv2yjeIbdfTbqH+jNlztUIY25uBTAc+xV50bW6a4Tl10onka20WJF58LPnQ2aw 3dF2erpE4rT9Hv2DZg83+qEIykqBpGxFnTsSWh470yarLkuyDuc= =4cbD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--