From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50592)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqg9p-0004X0-26
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:23:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqg9l-0000YC-RM
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:23:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54901)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eqg9l-0000Y2-OF
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:23:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqg9l-0003MF-He
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:23:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#30441] [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.66.0.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30441.B30441.151974134512849@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20180212233358.4911-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<20180213194633.GA1536@jasmine.lan> <20180217135807.GB17522@jurong>
	<87woyy4w3l.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1uyv8yv.fsf@fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:22:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87k1uyv8yv.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Tue, 27
	Feb 2018 14:49:12 +0100")
Message-ID: <87r2p6342r.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: 30441@debbugs.gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>>> This is a change for the next core-updates cycle, so I put it on my
>>>> local core-updates-next branch. But please try to remember it, too :)
>>>
>>> would it not be better to build it (after the next core-updates merge,
>>> or even the next release) on a feature branch?
>>
>> I=E2=80=99d recommend either that or current =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 (=
though you=E2=80=99d need to
>> check with Leo and Marius if that=E2=80=99s fine) or =E2=80=98core-updat=
es=E2=80=99.
>
> Current 'staging' is almost built, so it would have to be the next round.
>
> Also, Boost has ~1400 dependents, so it's a bit heavy even for 'staging'.

Sounds reasonable.

> Let's try to do a new 'core-updates' soonish instead.

Actually =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 already exist, so I suppose we can =
give it a try
right away?

berlin.guixsd.org should have substitutes for the core packages on
=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99, hopefully making it less painful to try thi=
ngs out.

Ludo=E2=80=99.