From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Pykhalov Subject: bug#30641: Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in CPAN updater Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 05:12:26 +0300 Message-ID: <87r2p5g8vp.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <20180128184437.32296-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87a7wxrdop.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaep9kg0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87o9kgkchr.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8q89e15.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vaemgv37.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvu68c74.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEv-0007L3-FR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:13:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEs-00055F-9n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:13:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEs-000555-6u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEr-00050S-SF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:13:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrES-0007HD-6o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:12:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEP-0004pN-0j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:12:36 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]:33871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqrEO-0004nL-Oa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:12:32 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l191so1215523lfe.1 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:12:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tvu68c74.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sat, 24 Feb 2018 19:38:55 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 30641@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Guix, Previous discussion [1] talks about =E2=80=98guix refresh=E2=80=99 for CPAN= updater needs to ignore =E2=80=98v=E2=80=99 prefix in a =E2=80=98version=E2=80=99 f= ield of a package record. Marius Bakke writes: > Oleg Pykhalov writes: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Sorry, I meant the opposite: we don't add the "v" prefix. It would be >>> nice to make the CPAN updater aware of that. >> >> I'll close current bug report. Should we open a new one for CPAN >> updater fix purpose? Sounds good! I think the GitHub updater already ignores the "v" prefix when comparing versions, so there might be some inspiration there. >>>> I see a bunch of packages packages have "v" prefix: >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:3599: (version "v2.49.1") >>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:7969: (version "v0.0.2") >>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:8697: (version "v0.2.13") >>>> ./gnu/packages/networking.scm:778: (version "v0.003") >>>> ./gnu/packages/mail.scm:1755: (version "v2.9.0") >>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >>> >>> Let's fix these :-) >> >> I guess it's better to do after a CPAN updater fix. WDYT? No opinion either way :-) Example of =E2=80=98guix refresh=E2=80=99 [2] wants to upgrade a package wi= th the same version because of =E2=80=98v=E2=80=99 prefix: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: licen= secheck 3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D30274#164 [2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D30274#161 Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlqWEAoACgkQckbhHGm3 lWnqRxAAhY6vAyOpxjbWiZDoq91yb0+ewiAkltFbvRDov99IquZocdnrsr5tJIXr 327n57mb2mSH5oDPcljUu6cot0GuPZx3fm7/MFlzKgHq05BAge44U+mGo1cKLHoq 0x/psQUH3s0XOUR53DLle6d404fkzMXeoG47txeQrxloZAzFdMcNBih77u1mSWOQ 7DmFTBTQ/WLj/apqkWcjTuFj/tsmVmqBSGeXxVTlL2boFGoI/dTYeO9hgv4UOuIA qthfpkrPsVyw6RAIbIICTYW9Vt7vxIY+LcLeum6jesuST1Urw5+qAA8aOS7dSty6 DNxxRt5IdWR38HWbz2dkE3oiOQDOQZbM3mgKJhb3h2pIrIDwGiU1CwMEUydhVuwH 34jueoWxRITnCuAug2I0HH16JBPL1Vpc9LHBougMXgIq/9DD6AnL1wGT9iAyVdGQ /Var1KCxti/CpNYU8s4rb05wjq+o306H4lAmjY6Klz9t2URST6IO7VCams6BL0ZS PMCa5BwPy6BLprEdSDgVhNXHEVolqa9y09fe9D96GYmXTPYhdtPl+Q47BaX5MxNK ENsnTvivg7Y7ioVO7pmQxTMxiuNw/UQnNgYBI2kgIPnj+fPWRtCaMoWWEjz86G+X KUIsi92RYeW7DSJ/BjmO0fVSTQ77eUXTD6sAeKG+3fIt0/4vGnU= =cFAl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--