From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Cuirass news Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 14:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2p2fw98.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877es6x5xj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lggmjjgo.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1w6jjak.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8raxeym.fsf@gnu.org> <20180126153005.259a75e8@scratchpost.org> <87zi4z1eb0.fsf@gnu.org> <20180127181852.42f0bcbf@scratchpost.org> <87fu6bwqix.fsf@gnu.org> <20180208172905.19e9e789@scratchpost.org> <871shvt94p.fsf@gnu.org> <20180209000526.5b9ea8e7@scratchpost.org> <87wozm4i12.fsf@gnu.org> <20180209122931.5a47e63e@scratchpost.org> <877ermyuj2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180209180608.79fb856b@scratchpost.org> <874lmpw0rj.fsf@gnu.org> <20180213101236.5c74e577@scratchpost.org> <87zi4bsn37.fsf@gnu.org> <877erfqhy4.fsf@gnu.org> <20180219163506.2037e56e@scratchpost.org> <20180219230843.09660e23@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erkdO-0000Pa-Fn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:22:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erkdK-0006dh-G8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:22:02 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:53390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erkdK-0006dT-8e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:21:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180219230843.09660e23@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2018 23:08:43 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > Pushed both. Awesome! Inlining output fetching does not quite have the performance impact I was hoping for. For example, /api/queue remains quite slow (sometimes a tenth of a second but often several seconds.) The problem might be elsewhere though, perhaps some Fiber scheduling issue. > 2 of the unit tests fail with the mysterious error message: > > unexpected value # I fixed that in dbea9790d30ff1c2e80585e9441d45ed0b740e30. Please don=E2=80= =99t push when tests fail. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.