From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1Ja2-0007nL-EG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:30:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1JZy-0006E4-6t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:30:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f1JZy-0006E0-3V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f1JZx-0003SQ-Sl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:30:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#30972] [PATCH] gnu: virtuoso-ose: Unbundle zlib and build with readline Resent-Message-ID: References: <87k1twkwex.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi2sm33j.fsf@fastmail.com> From: Roel Janssen In-reply-to: <87zi2sm33j.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 00:29:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87r2o3omv2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30972@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> From 80b26cfcc3d64588738e5fecc92f3eabc214ed4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Roel Janssen >> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:13:23 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: virtuoso-ose: Unbundle zlib and build with readline >> support. >> >> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (virtuoso-ose): Unbundle zlib and build with >> readline support. > > Please mention the changes to [inputs] and [arguments] here. Also, > assuming there is an internal copy of zlib, can you remove it with a > source 'snippet'? Thanks for the quick response! Then I'll need to rerun =E2=80=9Cautogen.sh=E2=80=9D to make sure =E2=80=9Clibsrc/zlib/Makefile.in=E2=80=9D isn't included in the configure p= hase. That in turns needs the following packages added to native-inputs: autoconf, automake, bison, flex, gettext, gperf, libtool, perl, and pkg-config. Does that justify removing the zlib source directory? If so, I'll send the updated patch. Otherwise, I'll just update the commit message. Would this be a proper commit message: gnu: virtuoso-ose: Unbundle zlib and build with readline support. * gnu/packages/databases.scm (virtuoso-ose): [inputs]: Add zlib, and readline; [arguments]: Add --without-internal-zlib, and --with-readline. Thanks for your time. Kind regards, Roel Janssen