From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Branson Subject: Re: GSoC: Adding a web interface similar to the Hydra web interface Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:07:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87r2laafol.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87d0xyn9zs.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0xswvls.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2m4ntk4.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87tvqxy4i9.fsf@elephly.net> <87in78hxo2.fsf@elephly.net> <878t7xb58o.fsf@elephly.net> <874lijbqvf.fsf@elephly.net> <20180606200210.7a9c4dd6@scratchpost.org> <20180612183504.2621cefa@scratchpost.org> <8736xrd64y.fsf@elephly.net> <87bmcebxfx.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7HE-0002AZ-OJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:01:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7HC-00076u-2g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:01:36 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fT7HB-00076D-VC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:01:34 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CB721956 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:01:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dobby (unknown [72.12.220.132]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DCB88102BC for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:01:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > Joshua Branson ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2018. = j=C3=BAn. 13., Sze 15:52): > > Tatiana Sholokhova writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for your reviews! > > > > I've just fixed codestyle issues and replaced HTML5 preamble with XHTM= L. > > Just cause I'm curious, why XHTML instead HTML5? Is XHTML better to par= se? > (This question comes from non guix developer by the way. Just an enthus= iast). > > > > > > > Thanks again for your excellent work! > > > > -- > > Ricardo > > Joshua, both formats have advantages, and also disadvantages. I think thi= s issue deserves its own discussion. It would be nice to collect the opinio= ns, but I think that currently we have a good > quality and well integrated xml generator, and we do not have a html5 gen= erator. Please correct me if I am wrong. Nope you sound right. I'm not arguing in favor or html5 over xhtml. Both are widely supported by all browsers. Just trying to learn. Thanks!