From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1sd-0002Mz-1F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:40:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1sY-0007Ee-Vy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:40:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1sY-0007EV-Mm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fV1sY-0003xm-AS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:40:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31548] [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-stumpwm: Update to 18.05. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20180522084332.30409-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87603ezfqn.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0xkxbak.fsf@gmail.com> <871sdz3egs.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaaimljw.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3fd9zlu.fsf@gmail.com> <20180617175916.3df21a46@uwaterloo.ca> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:39:26 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20180617175916.3df21a46@uwaterloo.ca> (Andy Patterson's message of "Sun, 17 Jun 2018 17:59:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87r2l3ai5t.fsf_-_@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Andy Patterson Cc: 31548@debbugs.gnu.org --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Andy, Andy Patterson writes: [=E2=80=A6] >> Changing =E2=80=9Cname=E2=80=9D field unfortunatelly breaks the build. = I didn't >> investigate a reason yet and I don't want to push without changing >> =E2=80=9Cname=E2=80=9D field because users will install the =E2=80=9Cstu= mpwm-next=E2=80=9D by default. > > I haven't looked much into your patch, but this might be because the > asdf build system uses the package name to guess where the system will > be defined. If the package name differs from the system name, this > behaviour can be overridden using the #:asd-system-name argument. > > Hope that helps It does, thank you. For the record =E2=80=98#:asd-system-name "stumpwm"=E2= =80=99. Upstream pushed a new release. I'll test it during current week and push the following patch probably. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-sbcl-stumpwm-Update-to-18.05.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: gnu: sbcl-stumpwm: Update to 18.05. From=201e7ee0f57d46161cb655c3adcaf0f20ef12f9bdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Pykhalov Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:27:30 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-stumpwm: Update to 18.05. * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl-stumpwm): Update to 18.05. =2D-- gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index 258e9827a..720ac070c 100644 =2D-- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -944,18 +944,19 @@ from other CLXes around the net.") (define-public sbcl-stumpwm (package (name "sbcl-stumpwm") =2D (version "1.0.0") + (version "18.05") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append "https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/archive/" version ".tar.gz")) (sha256 =2D (base32 "1maxp98gh64az3d9vz9br6zdd6rc9fmj2imvax4by85g6kxv= dz1i")) + (base32 "1n2gaab3lwgf5r1hmwdcw13dkv9xdd7drn2shx28kfxvhdc9kb= b9")) (file-name (string-append "stumpwm-" version ".tar.gz")))) (build-system asdf-build-system/sbcl) (inputs `(("cl-ppcre" ,sbcl-cl-ppcre) =2D ("clx" ,sbcl-clx))) + ("clx" ,sbcl-clx) + ("alexandria" ,sbcl-alexandria))) (outputs '("out" "lib")) (arguments '(#:phases =2D-=20 2.17.1 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't know what to do with =E2=80=98sbcl-stumpwm-next=E2=80=99 package. = I think we shouldn't push it because of our policy to stick with stable versions for recipes. But anybody fill free to ping me if you need next version. Regards, Oleg. --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlsoJo4ACgkQckbhHGm3 lWlMaxAAtqdtT2kAG4TwP1YWg+n8JnOg3q5Hs4+fCvUaPYH3zAwjyWcpp4Wmo6sa sMgRSXtYXOcG0OMWRbCk8cpCYtuOT+01SF4qeLWVTFaRPpC9iN2dFauIwdsfKAIE ld0udqW7EpnGdAg00SPAw/b5FsCe4OG5KarUMubt/a4cXRJcsAr4tSnD1a7CA/J0 fZQQSx7oJvpr76ogTIc0TnmMCzvfalr8QNB/IKLEV3qS+pN5wXnz1fbLtaw45A1p REBoCcV66dV8U6cR7pP286AA0SG+p/fUPYxthVR+ZH8fWhjEUwHUBkBV5IUSMqJs fKm5k2jDP+30FEd008Z+gEEifmULL0a3vSVtBlgG4ferG24L20GjLgSQLkyZmVJg lV9+pJqWOf6dsrQrrfdiyrib3ax0FMzUNtbznBhSxsvyCQF0mBHvpYQfCEJF4TIa ypLmaAI3rNefIYuFxe+5Gjq8HAV2h1iVY7vEVrWGHOWdpXgQVzKoN+7fSdmllKvW 71jweLbGEJCrggWkpNd3QmChpjTRVHs/5twe7FoYmSI2NkjgYm+thWoaN2w2XAFV DECr7OCPtCnM+SLXVL4BF2G6nmUpvKQxjfoQIjhgVhWVVJFpIlD0aXp9t4tZen4m ONUdMmqWtBube91zijhRJmPlm2DN8zMr8OS2xlBLi7qX3Ix0qzM= =0JCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=--