Hello Andy, Andy Patterson writes: […] >> Changing “name” field unfortunatelly breaks the build. I didn't >> investigate a reason yet and I don't want to push without changing >> “name” field because users will install the “stumpwm-next” by default. > > I haven't looked much into your patch, but this might be because the > asdf build system uses the package name to guess where the system will > be defined. If the package name differs from the system name, this > behaviour can be overridden using the #:asd-system-name argument. > > Hope that helps It does, thank you. For the record ‘#:asd-system-name "stumpwm"’. Upstream pushed a new release. I'll test it during current week and push the following patch probably.