From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Preparing the reduced bootstrap tarballs, take 3 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:36:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2eox8wd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ftw213dw.fsf@ITSx01.pdp10.guru> <87ftw0ubby.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg5slpm4.fsf@gnu.org> <87y39rol3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87y39qj0xm.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9amsnyx.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2fe319g.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87sgzrdj0s.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87tvjvatt1.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm5u232i.fsf@gnu.org> <87wooi7eqx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlxu-0002F0-5U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:37:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWlxs-00004v-1T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:37:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wooi7eqx.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sun, 09 Dec 2018 19:10:30 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > Hi! > >> I=E2=80=99ve just uploaded these to >> : >> >> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz >> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz.sig >> mescc-tools-static-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz >> mescc-tools-static-0.5.2-0.bb062b0-i686-linux.tar.xz.sig >> mes-minimal-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-i686-linux.tar.xz >> mes-minimal-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-i686-linux.tar.xz.sig > > Great! > >> Could you adjust bootstrap.scm to refer to this URL? Currently I see >> bootstrap.scm refers to a different version of >> linux-libre-headers-stripped so it should be the only one whose hash >> needs to be changed. > > I don't see that...and the hash matches. We=E2=80=99ve discussed it in person, and now I think we=E2=80=99re all set= ! :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.