From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37408)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwQVp-0008DF-0i
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:58:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwQVm-0007i4-NX
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:58:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56471)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gwQVm-0007gh-En
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:58:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gwQVm-0003cP-9z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 06:58:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#28128] [PATCH] scripts: system: Add support for container
	network sharing.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28128.B28128.155066384413856@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20170817191334.26269-1-mail@cbaines.net>
	<cu7k1hw8bln.fsf@systemreboot.net>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
In-reply-to: <cu7k1hw8bln.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:57:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87r2c2u0yz.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 28128@debbugs.gnu.org


Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> writes:

> What if, instead of a flag to `guix system', we introduced two fields --
> container? and container-shared-network? -- in the <operating-system>
> record type?

I=E2=80=99d rather not do this.  Is this really a property of the operating
system definition?  Making it part of <operating-system> would make it
difficult to use the same definition for containers, virtual machines,
or bare-metal instantiations.

--=20
Ricardo