From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:55:42 +0100
Message-ID: <87r2b4xp5t.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <4d892ffa-f2ae-422d-ea5d-0b3705ed15a7@riseup.net>
	<874l81z68w.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87sgvk1w5r.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48284)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h5skJ-0006mH-GX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:56:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h5skG-0002FF-OT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:56:07 -0400
Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21117)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h5sk7-00027Y-S8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:55:59 -0400
In-reply-to: <87sgvk1w5r.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> We have this.  It=E2=80=99s called =E2=80=9Cbtanks=E2=80=9D.
>
> Shouldn't we name this "battle-tanks"?
>
>
>> I think this one is packaged: see the `crawl' and `crawl-tiles' packages.
>
> Shouldn't we name this "dungeon-crawl-stone-soup"?
>
>
>> > Armagetron Advanced - A 3-D variant of the Light Cycles sub-game of the
>> > classic Tron arcade game. Highly configurable and very fun to play.
>>
>> This we have already. :)
>
> It's named "armagetronad".  Shouldn't we name this
> "armagetron-advanced"?

Instead of renaming the packages (whose names follow our packaging
guidelines) how about adding the full name of the games to the
description?

--
Ricardo