From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5tHv-0005Db-Rk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:30:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5t5Y-0003zi-Cy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:18:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5t5W-0003yz-J8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:18:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h5t5W-00021h-99 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:18:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#34824] [PATCH staging] libdrm/Mesa Meson patch series Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20190318104441.2dacc080@mykolab.com> References: <20190312141615.2d96bb7d@mykolab.com> <87y35d8jmw.fsf@fastmail.com> <20190318104441.2dacc080@mykolab.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:17:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87r2b48dxk.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 34824@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Rutger Helling writes: > Hi Marius, > > thanks for the review. > > So when I rebuilt my entire system a while back with these patches it > was only those few SDL packages that were affected. Unfortunately I have > no way of knowing for sure if it won't happen anywhere else, but it > does seem to be something contained to just SDL(1). > > The packages fail with the following error if "mesa" isn't an explicit > input: > > ld: cannot find -lGL > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > WDYT? Should I go ahead and push these patches or do you have other > ideas? Well, we still don't know why -lGL is suddenly there. Did you inspect the pkg-config files or sdl-config output to figure out why? I suspect Mesa should be propagated somewhere, instead of added as an input in a bunch of places. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlyPqHgACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqxPQf8DoSS28oUy3n/WGV4Jn+NzoR7SBSnXz/Rw7jbleOZKdBCN3L47ymL2mX6 nsAsNWvv62hwaz7+MQF68rCvgosrCbhqe4zk5hKhwJv/3NVimIJt/aErfKhFdjg2 0Ye9P0mqnc3hwAwzXHFW44M2lu7FFlFbiVum3Y2oTxSz3dNZ16h4VJV8p1sostnY DvqSUtUsOU2tc4bv4zQ/3qqKuJpF02K2qeYgLt0/JrRB86B8x7PKl3UZsU1glq1R FQKLCPBjqE2kBgrHb6tfC3tj7fasDuZ14+UOCeCqNsIWKxERSGoPwLSv+qpYWaRs ywTiKsOfIl0L2uAne0aX9m+g8qJj0A== =xpht -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--