From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: bug#37804: getmail service documentation error? Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:47:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87r23aqyv4.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <20191018070529.dnqp2qcnsimjoet4@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMzT-0004l1-4D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:48:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMzS-0000Uo-2O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:48:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMzR-0000Ug-Vx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMzR-000140-RH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:48:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMyk-0003sQ-TV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:47:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMyj-0000Iw-Dx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:47:18 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:50586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLMyi-0000IK-26 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:47:17 -0400 In-reply-to: <20191018070529.dnqp2qcnsimjoet4@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 37804@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes: > The documentation of the getmail service=E2=80=99s delete_after setting is > confusing and appears to contradict upstream documentation at > . > > I am not sure, but the code in the getmail file in the getmail source > code also appears to call destination.deliver_message before deleting, > in agreement with upstream. > > Can someone with knowledge check? Shall I push the attached patch? The change and patch looks reasonable to me. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl2pbf9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XfEUhAAs9HRl7u3XdNUiSuE8MfaegpOF60ULBiuFSbkIWkg4pY12SO5nQY33cd1 UbYmpFWj4wj4rc3hnaY/oIhTySj/gW65tYDZ/GgUzGd1hJc2+oaybh4gSVAGZNLa FvLuDaKN/0dMEzXppBYt642iskS6DIVwFW6VjicjSAhbdQ5whSCJZtRSV9sihPqt QreRQnR7mBtOHwNUCw74DEyo8JCk5DMoSVkmzcy+JOKvYj1E6ru8fj5+P2Oy+J1r DT+jmVil8kpD9zzGETFd5SGTab+5XnqaLZQUncYSrvERT7vOB9N2ZjW+ElCQr9jL 9b+TBVCvtOlLRFeAi+fvehypYl48A1P8U6RJTklAJmoi4T2D5NEbOYzJvUUz4MMH bxN36yeAWo47dVm0GEXyRyPZsSzRuCPDxWP7jx8MArtSlt3RcJdMDsLSgWBEFIdi ZpIXCA4BTLRjL6CnlCcK/M9J5chRtqkWxOLywrdL4X2sitZ1lK6gkjxwDmlaM6mm BjYglEGhSGVTt6f+8k0olDFRlJ1ecOUe1sboouJItxB4f08guFrrqGq3alCRcJbR I6ctwZR1b9+mlkA0Qnb4Js165UrviqrlXelkViBZi7Z9rqSRT8GfA0YkDlUXh+b5 yd3vEKdMzp3etDiv+/XdA6NxkJ0k9K/q+2UaNL/JdVFDTBuQqIA= =e42t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--