From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:45:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87r22ek7x4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <20191104214754.793ec2ff@interia.pl> <20191105175001.389c6117@interia.pl> <87pni5qouc.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191106172445.3bdd057d@interia.pl> <87r22lorwh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <877e4bo646.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191107204757.23dd08de@interia.pl> <874kzfo21r.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191108192542.5daa7a0a@interia.pl> <87zhh2kdt2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191111111423.66ec31d5@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52487) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iU7D7-0004X8-3a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:46:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iU7D3-0007bd-Ow for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:46:16 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:50009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iU7D3-0007Zq-J2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:46:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191111111423.66ec31d5@interia.pl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Wielkiewicz Cc: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Wielkiewicz writes: > Is it normal guix ran from "./pre-inst-env" builds everything from the > source code? I ran "./pre-inst-env guix build jami --cores=3D2 > --max-jobs=3D2" and Guix started to build webkitgtk, even though the > substitute is available. Or did I change something that causes webkit > to get rebuild. If you changed any (recursive) input of webkitgtk, then yes, it will trigger a rebuilt. If you didn't, but if you "guix pulled" and upstream changed an input recently while the build farm hasn't had time to produce a substitute, then you'll have to build webkitgtk yourself, or wait for the build farm. > This made checking if Jami builds properly not possible, > because my machine has only 3,1 GB of RAM. > I could set up Guix on my second, more powerfull machine, but last time > I tried, the installer script didn't work on Devuan. I don't know if > it's a bug, or is the system not supported. I could install Guix System > there, but the machine is highly proprietary and Guix isn't yet fully > ready for the desktop use for me (not every package I use, including > Jami, is available yet). > But I suppose Jami will work this time, there's not much (or nothing) to > fix now. I'm attaching all patches, including the most recent. Thanks a lot, I'll give it a shot then. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl3JO+cACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH+f6Qf8D2iN5UdUf9M8suz+uB25btK/EfsRHQE02pXUFexayCwOc51ShB/EW3Al ypZSFwRbvdubjGE6DzhhzVkV+1LWboZbFojH1ysTHDhzpBAscJ7qLOCDnIBgOkDf 8VINsc4WseAHh6g3WPlIXgWXgsGIkCWt9QK17HQYiIZtxmtb3gV1An9wUX6Ka/Jk a7huFM4IZVhg3f/wz4xlc5MQtTIlMxi3FwlA5XmbStDbI+MLU8zNV3A7CEELwfhN vqYQwa4kSkVQWe5MHvmKS4+IqTY62WusqJC/JBrUsHAPae2+jEgN1nibqHzTLmdn MnDDMLqZik2sKk8P9VAbfAO+UVZ50Q== =TUCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--