From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cross-compilation broken on canonical packages.
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 10:19:30 +0100
Message-ID: <87r1y5et7h.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <878snff7pv.fsf@gmail.com> <877e2zf7kv.fsf@gmail.com>
 <871rt0ntvy.fsf@gnu.org> <87fthc9vav.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2ut645u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tv5gbz0o.fsf@gmail.com> <87blrlu3zv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <877e29v7qu.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv5cwxv1.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87pnelmg5e.fsf@gmail.com> <878sl943uz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8736bg5coz.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1ykj776.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37936)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <m.othacehe@gmail.com>) id 1jA98p-0003LM-6c
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 04:19:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <m.othacehe@gmail.com>) id 1jA98o-0003nV-7P
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 04:19:35 -0500
In-reply-to: <87r1ykj776.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Hey Ludo,

> Do we need to do it for =E2=80=98lower-object=E2=80=99?  I think that one=
 is (almost)
> always called from a gexp compiler where it=E2=80=99s explicitly passed =
=E2=80=98system=E2=80=99
> and =E2=80=98target=E2=80=99.

Yes because of lower-object call in "system-derivation" procedure of
(gnu services).

> Also, a test or two would be welcome as it=E2=80=99s easy to break it wit=
hout
> noticing.
>
> Otherwise LGTM, thank you, and sorry for the delay!

Pushed with a few tests on core-updates, thanks for reviewing!

Mathieu