From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#40565: make authenticate fails: commit 77704cb13e5bebf412297dab764a00849a3cfdc0: key A0C5E3522EF8EF5C64CDB7F0FD73CAC719D32566 is missing Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:24:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1wnz9g7.fsf@nckx> References: <3B3HQBAD2MOK6.35A1W16EVTTG7@wilsonb.com> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7KB-00074J-S1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:25:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7K2-0000aZ-5e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:25:11 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7K1-0000aM-Ps for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jP7K1-0004Ls-Ld for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:25:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <3B3HQBAD2MOK6.35A1W16EVTTG7@wilsonb.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 40565@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Eric Bavier --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ela, Eric, elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > It looks like the referenced key doesn't exist in the=20 > keyservers: > > $ gpg --recv-keys A0C5E3522EF8EF5C64CDB7F0FD73CAC719D325 > gpg: keyserver receive failed: No data > > Am I flubbing something up? Or is this a legitimate issue? It's not you. =E2=80=98make authenticate=E2=80=99 is currently broken for = any=20 practical purpose. Eric, I didn't find any previous discussion about this. Could you=20 help us out by publishing this =E2=80=98secret=E2=80=99 key somewhere? :-) Your key at Savannah[0] is a different one and there's no=20 A0C5E3522EF8EF5C64CDB7F0FD73CAC719D325 on keys.openpgp.org, SKS,=20 keys.gnupg.net, or pgp.mit.edu. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: curl=20 https://savannah.gnu.org/people/viewgpg.php?user_id=3D93889 | gpg pub rsa2048/0x34532F9FAFCA8B8E 2016-05-26 [SC] Key fingerprint =3D 34FF 38BC D151 25A6 E340 A0B5 3453 2F9F=20 AFCA 8B8E uid Eric Bavier=20 sub rsa2048/0x5A9C1FD168338676 2016-05-26 [E] [expired:=20 2017-05-26] sub rsa2048/0x1EBBD204781F962C 2016-05-26 [S] [expired:=20 2017-05-26] sub rsa4096/0xFD73CAC719D32566 2017-06-13 [S] [expires:=20 2021-06-12] --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXpiGqAAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eR3UAPwPaKG/GuE22qduv6hYu/rIfQyMmUDmgXMFOjzU0a67PgD/UX6e0MbDEDCj ldMCelibp5+9hKrHM/k07NJFppu1CA4= =7FLN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--