From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51707)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jPY7f-0005Nz-30
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:02:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jPY7e-0008V5-0b
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:02:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58462)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jPY7d-0008UY-TO
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:02:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jPY7d-0000FO-P8
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:02:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40680] [PATCH] service: sddm: Have sddm-service-type conflict
 with other display managers.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40680.B40680.1587157266887@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20200417144115.2475-1-efraim@flashner.co.il>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:00:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200417144115.2475-1-efraim@flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's
 message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:41:15 +0300")
Message-ID: <87r1wlaku6.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: 40680@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> * gnu/services/sddm.scm (sddm-shepherd-service)[shepherd-service]:
> Conflict with 'xorg-server.
> ---
>
> I was looking over the services list with raingloom on IRC and I noticed
> that GDM and Slim both provision xorg-server, while SDDM provisions
> display-manager. To ensure that they conflict with each other we can
> either:
>
> A: Have SDDM conflict with 'xorg-server
>
> B: Have SDDM also provision 'xorg-server
>
> I'm currently using SDDM (in Wayland mode) to launch an X session of
> Enlightenment, so I think it's safe enough to say that SDDM can
> provision 'xorg-server.
>
> ---
>
>  gnu/services/sddm.scm | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/services/sddm.scm b/gnu/services/sddm.scm
> index 1921afce95..aa08859513 100644
> --- a/gnu/services/sddm.scm
> +++ b/gnu/services/sddm.scm
> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ Relogin=3D"              (if (sddm-configuration-relo=
gin? config)
>           (documentation "SDDM display manager.")
>           (requirement '(user-processes))
>           (provision '(display-manager))
> +         (conflicts-with '(xorg-server))

=E2=80=98conflicts-with=E2=80=99 doesn=E2=80=99t exist, right?  :-)

But yes, I think (provision '(xorg-server display-manager)) would be
fine.

Or we can even drop =E2=80=98display-manager=E2=80=99 since it=E2=80=99s no=
t used anywhere else.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.