From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GOd2DMRJuV7/AgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:49:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gDB5CNJJuV7dKAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:49:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A162E940418 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 12:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38962 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7s0-00049S-Gs for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:49:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7g6-00040L-5Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:37:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7g5-0007xi-Sw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:37:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7g5-0000nw-PR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41164] [PATCH 0/3] Add 'guix graph --path' Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41164 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: 41164@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41164-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41164.15892005883048 (code B ref 41164); Mon, 11 May 2020 12:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 41164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 12:36:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7fY-0000n6-Iw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7fX-0000ms-Dc for 41164@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7fS-0007ss-4a; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:22 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37676 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7fR-0005Bb-ME; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:36:21 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20200509230401.28364-1-ludo@gnu.org> <873687an8u.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 23 =?UTF-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 228 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:36:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Sun, 10 May 2020 18:18:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1vqir7f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -1.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.53994865046586]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.07), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ludo@gnu.org,guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[0.0.0.9:email]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DBL_PROHIBIT(0.00)[0.0.0.9:email]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: tyd+DpFO2ztr Hi, zimoun skribis: > ./pre-inst-env guix graph --path -t references libreoffice llvm > guix graph: error: no path from > '/gnu/store/rd24gl402vy5g5sm3azhq13mwdg5fbi1-libreoffice-6.4.2.2' to > '/gnu/store/bcgnx704v408sr7lcy480wcnbkcixwrw-llvm-10.0.0-opt-viewer' There=E2=80=99s a path to llvm@9 though. Such examples will of course bitrot over time because they depend on the dependency graph, which keeps changing. But that=E2=80=99s OK IMO: the goa= l is just to give an idea of what the tool can do. >> wording proposal in mind that is as concise? > > display the shortest path from node1 to node2 =E2=80=98node1=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98node2=E2=80=99 are undefined though=E2= =80=A6 >> As for =E2=80=98--path-to=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=98--path=E2=80=99: = I think a path in common >> language is directed (one follows a path from one place to another). > > My english is probably not enough good. (Note that is the same for me > with the french word "chemin".) > To me, "path" is often ambiguous because sometimes it means oriented > and sometimes not; depending on the context: topology, graph theory, > common life: synonymous of road or track and synonymous of route or > direction. > > This ambiguity added to the non positional option '--path' appears to > me confusing from where to where. > > My 2 remarks come from this ambiguity of the word "path". > Well, maybe it is only me. I don=E2=80=99t know, but I=E2=80=99m still unconvinced that =E2=80=98--pat= h-to=E2=80=99 is any better than =E2=80=98--path=E2=80=99. In the end, the intended audience consists = of people who know we=E2=80=99re talking about a DAG. Thanks for your feedback! Ludo=E2=80=99.