From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id oFkLCq0CEWFdpwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:25:49 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QASiBa0CEWGPUgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:25:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5754F1BBAD for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:25:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46724 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2Tb-0007me-D8 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:25:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2Sv-0007lc-KI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:25:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2Ss-0002rh-UW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:25:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2Ss-0002ci-LM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49947: Backtrace on "@abbr{...}" in package description Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49947 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sarah Morgensen Received: via spool by 49947-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49947.162850466810002 (code B ref 49947); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 49947) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2021 10:24:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55907 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2SJ-0002bA-Hf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:24:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2SH-0002ax-Lp for 49947@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:24:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2SC-0002L6-2i; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:24:20 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=45040 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mD2SB-00011E-QD; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:24:20 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <868s1blc4k.fsf@mgsn.dev> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:24:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <868s1blc4k.fsf@mgsn.dev> (Sarah Morgensen's message of "Sun, 08 Aug 2021 17:01:31 -0700") Message-ID: <87r1f2zzji.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 49947@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1628504748; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=slA1US5ZS2fTYFWavfruHF4Vd6izgdcz1eODPR29vzw=; b=ErSZmNvCgwBLl/+m2p2KIEDsuUQoPnZ4xrrF0LhEPsc8gLNhsdGxjJ17jXh1u9v5Vn5t+Y M+B8c+oF9Gs9fuUsOTmKZQbY+kGwytR8qCOtbmUG9qetnAZe6q7+l0Ay1s1JjCLfkOmiB9 fYw7IO/ZTt//LGQt/eq1ThpojMYSiGJGIOCerQnd/rkEAJbDbxpS/4pIlEQLaYcxjTtiou 1sZj3H4BmuXxLw8H0kWEJ6pSB1JtEzsZakPDjq8gu1X+XTuuL5JbukHiINY9vQumo0jOLT KXeY83t8pn9W/XlZ61EVOpg0Rewhm+qguzgzBOh6TKUEKQu+ToyzZBjtDta1eQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1628504748; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cQ368mWeJD6iTBUpywBHdkYT6uGS8Cb4Ay96vLh/Jyfbla1mRNR67DFphyqLgcc2zmWAUr yRvqdCty21NS2QHRapTmPMUZJX0IUIo7r+JM3hEmJ8WnjOEvheAcJOGAHO8IswRDBjNSEW VYTv4aq25Red8aOurmu453pzZGn0BOKgJoy20o+rANPyMPQ69FlRf5OgSXp3qUPnIm9xyg 6L95dxt64jLxKAgyySKoVH8Li/xPGlXK/BOnKapaZhvOcmlvWkvM6ih32+T8rHGrBlakD/ qHyfkbkKoreThv2E/jXM+A/AAyhDxCYcAOZSnGJmzJ+WFijmvHII1q6djHn9lw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5754F1BBAD X-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Qw2pj2vux2Aq Hi Sarah, Sarah Morgensen skribis: > The Texinfo manual says [0] that I should be able to use @abbr, and > prefer it over @acronym when the text is not all capital letters, but I > get a backtrace when I try to use it in a package description: > > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In unknown file: > 15 (apply-smob/0 #) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 724:2 14 (call-with-prompt _ _ #) > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 13 (_ #(#(#))) > In guix/ui.scm: > 2185:7 12 (run-guix . _) > 2148:10 11 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) > In guix/scripts/package.scm: > 906:9 9 (_) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 634:9 8 (for-each # ?) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1747:15 7 (with-exception-handler # ?) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > 634:9 6 (for-each # ?) > In guix/ui.scm: > 1558:14 5 (package->recutils _ # _ # _ # _) > 1432:23 4 (texi->plain-text _) > In texinfo.scm: > 1132:22 3 (parse _) > 967:36 2 (loop # (*fragment*) # ?) > 92:2 1 (command-spec _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > Throw to key `parser-error' with args `(#f "Unknown command" abbr)'. > > If this isn't an oversight, and not all Texinfo markup is supported, > that should be noted in the manual. Oh right, Guile=E2=80=99s Texinfo implementation doesn=E2=80=99t support 10= 0% of Texinfo markup. We could write it down in the Guix manual, but we could also improve Guile=E2=80=99s Texinfo modules, especially since such additions should be relatively simple. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.