From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4KLyDKY+B2bxMwAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:20:22 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4KLyDKY+B2bxMwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:20:22 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b="OGON/t77"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1711750822; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=NjAfHLn3jn2RtTm/Uzs9G4DU6wmCZmE/sbl8kYqsec8=; b=dqjhg3ANiHPNuTuQ/jNtrZ9C7XpV/uDEiGn1coGNp79lymBwwtq+H3LvCSbI1j6hCYfLLC nhxc5OOEjWFcRMhzsGNISygNkTapp0w+12eNKnalBw+ljIOmHsbGuF8cQ8WYHu+yHfWqkx o7aOC5W8d0/jZKYFcqkVbqK1RpnAo0DfIup5zx2USV+mIOb+dSMSNEA311JBmKNBmlvq82 wLcj/7zj5U6HvQbn+MNXTTUEK0M+40vQwq9aMd6zYvP8jTfXqQcbyswt9Wl+2pIvga8nEN PidlV6DZe3st9auI1bYURnpo65kltocecmD8VYsqUABf4gdw1PTQiZy4ulQ7Bw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b="OGON/t77"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1711750822; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=i/Che3kWoVWBTxgxON6//rKoSxu5TZijQLLHoWSoIdGq3lJ+0sDOPNONlUQbMs69nJtEDl SUOM+y33hj9Uo+EwssJJD7OzkgzR5nUc47yyXwEVbkM6WLzrzvtzN1yuPnTk36J6vFlfhC KGVkL+vB1jsnQZS/WAwJm+VeyBEU6iSmNGKt9gBfxmGHeYAMdXDhlNqriaunEnnx+G+Q2o rz85U5iJbzra3BPQzluCu4TOM+0CHZ22BHhyf/qhqYvF2pvhdwxxMAdA8GFGfVs5B2QvSr APL40wVHuvYjbw5kTLQdnz/8aQlVPJg1Vlmi2t0SRvLgMNlx9n7+QifyFWAYsg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255645462 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:20:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZv-0004uW-GE; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:20:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZt-0004tj-Ik for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:20:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZt-0001Qk-0O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:20:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZu-0003Yk-H8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69185] [PATCH master] gnu: ocaml: Update to 5.1.1 Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69185 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: pukkamustard Cc: 69185@debbugs.gnu.org, Marc Coquand Received: via spool by 69185-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69185.171175075313482 (code B ref 69185); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:20:02 +0000 Received: (at 69185) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2024 22:19:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZ6-0003VJ-Nr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:19:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34046) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKZ5-0003V2-4n for 69185@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:19:11 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqKYy-0001Dv-6M; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:19:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=NjAfHLn3jn2RtTm/Uzs9G4DU6wmCZmE/sbl8kYqsec8=; b=OGON/t77Hui33/vgpKS8 wt6xNLyv9dQ22BysNyd4zY2KXG86z/e17GKnGPDwESBvy81ksCyR8a1/HE+pJccfiz5D4QtZRdjsb pG5hQaJNWl/m2rUlw7v6A0tJMfsbE97qbw9Bj5/NdLc9gYy3A42T/2kXmaYv+AKY+xeuXne2mvoX9 0ibY0eBYMykAIRuCxJnefjywT2qKPcO8ZFAI4KpIxdS3sdF3rx8AsCwcGXiCnGFlctKSvoT170V6B MMgLtEJj5jaAKQYnBRQKaTfuSmz3WK5JVmAD3UnI8zwTNb3DBM0rw1bJt4SOzHOpuOgrvxZyU/5qp GBhOAyUyKeS0lA==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <86zfukofrg.fsf@posteo.net> (pukkamustard@posteo.net's message of "Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:03:49 +0000") References: <861q806r8g.fsf@posteo.net> <87edby3uac.fsf@mccd.space> <86zfukofrg.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87r0fsfzqh.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 255645462 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.01 X-Spam-Score: -7.01 X-TUID: 3Qtf1ppR2jBn Hello pukkamustard, pukkamustard skribis: > Hm, I'd say it's good to keep versions around that are being used by > other packages in Guix or it is a version where we can assume that > significant amount of people are using it from Guix for things outside > of Guix. > > I think OCaml 5.0 is neither: > > - The ocaml5.0-* packages are mostly to get a working development > environment (ocaml5.0-merlin and dependencies). > - Our ocaml5.0-eio is outdated and the recently released Eio 1.0.0 only > supports OCaml 5.1.1 or later. > - There's not much reason to use OCaml 5.0 when OCaml 5.1 is available. > > I'd suggest replacing OCaml 5.0 with OCaml 5.1 in Guix. Can removing 5.0 be done in a followup patch? Should we apply this patch in this meantime, or would you suggest adjusting it beforehand? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.