From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id wNRUB1qcKWfGbQEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:17:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id wNRUB1qcKWfGbQEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 05:17:30 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=UEBpBPVL; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=bBqK5f24; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1730780250; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Kz2NESCQuo/4sSiwlT/X3w2iHPItOOcQdArda+Pj+50=; b=q3cpnVx+9JQpYIBk4QmBGYo35GSQRHpMaVN2ojnQFs943GOytzSYhdfFijUXQZq3y9NjHd va1GO0LJgPnDMn9TsdIk/kIPt0nnT16AOIaO9VVtjWJ2TNU6/+hGqto1aWu1rWgs0G1L9b UqrYPjU4Dzy9ZrPA9T+FyjuSFlOkXu6kUbZ759wwWge6WW6rk9ym/hz24nWQ3LUj/5Jc+I qR33bdJ3gqlihadKIDNtPx7mzpn90LNSeDpsqzW0K7bDArH6QKjmAQEcUuFN+FbauO0NTm XhsOKHGEGtgPqz3YJTtmhCz+JcRCryk7z77E7X34FICjsgtWRyzWK4CQsN8Kxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=UEBpBPVL; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=bBqK5f24; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1730780250; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ePLm33yFh+ydhkcGIrK8I/Kd8yN3A7/yYtRgninI5XgcNBAuNQNMRy5DFy7zQgsURAngw0 IL7CJoBjJ9RTUJVEWP7Df30UUZnhmjIy8Kdl7H0KQPXq4sOsdGi4FpjS/SVVN4ROzlTqC6 So8gO6FdXV2WGf/Ht8b5PWzwDRG4qhMtpIRfMnowKOUGF9gottN1dwoLPovgwypH91MJbx ooGBXnR6T+Hu7OVWG1RLDLU1kWRQo470qAptU96JoTuIa03Gih7qUfTTerypMenU09MWDv XYpZc5YvRUtE8lwuxZq8ldWzNImGGsnhWTTG8pFkY9ipstBMHuT2qgNvxzHRag== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600B242483 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 05:17:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8B06-00088Z-CJ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:17:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8B02-00087g-FP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:17:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t8B02-0003nk-5o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:17:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=Kz2NESCQuo/4sSiwlT/X3w2iHPItOOcQdArda+Pj+50=; b=UEBpBPVLQZgTMakBKbfhoSPXPTV2J/kyheTsQCx0ounIlG39SipLYGtmYdfSTHUj+ITcDxYYaHarZWl1dDySvgFNejmG/Y3MVbVnHvglSGElT6aV6at25RjimmjEEBm+54TrlIdHaI9orCpcuJyi37UPYzHns8N1tZEwGBkTJc+JlfLq8xg84c0/JKGjGc+tXtKLxCINllHl9b/q2CuLF3qiSHP4mdSXgWcdaD/l8FwbbxunsPglCKC8nR+GaT1Enwi/qC7RGcaPecGU0JEJNGvWrnFrPaHhr1yygYbKswbucwOTIi/I76gjH/VtkCrYPeyQwvqskzjTIv00DDtLjQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8B02-0006xw-11 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Z572 Cc: dev@jpoiret.xyz, efraim@flashner.co.il, 73288@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Josselin Poiret , Efraim Flashner , John Kehayias via Guix-patches via , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.173078017126721 (code B ref 73288); Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2024 04:16:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8AzC-0006wv-OW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:11 -0500 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:31021) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8Az8-0006wL-Tz for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:16:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1730780160; x=1731039360; bh=Kz2NESCQuo/4sSiwlT/X3w2iHPItOOcQdArda+Pj+50=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=bBqK5f24K5DZT2P5C9RUBymIkRy0PHyVbUOL0ipSB6EyxsCXxmrMCRBVG0+aIuGld UqnAmeXoePRv1xBidu548GDXX6g2tM++VPUqtjHgCTf9owyvWKTYNH1BB5LEKg88A/ HHvOP9Z3UMwXnSfuQXoPN3stXucUv+s9kAbDvTgTGNr4Sff6M2tIgSC6rb58paDbGA 7thVTXFS657BtVVdRx/Z8SQ2judQ7qljteYNrYyPRxTn/7G8Sgv4vy+izjTbtXay7v BC/NZJ/9Q8Ltc/0MV0rq8DbksdEnP3aWdTdxcS1UHqvLNzifffNDJ5DY8zu3dITmiW 1b4GHboZXhilQ== Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 04:15:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87r07q9uz2.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> References: <87bk0opbl7.fsf_-_@protonmail.com> <87cyjck50n.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> <87zfmfafv6.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msifosdv.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 2f29ffe424984f655c948300cc89293db8eb7f5c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: John Kehayias X-ACL-Warn: , John Kehayias via Guix-patches From: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.06 X-Spam-Score: 0.06 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 600B242483 X-TUID: M98ZIcDjmR0w On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:50 AM, Z572 wrote: > John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 03:02 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 06:04:08PM +0800, Z572 wrote: >>>> John Kehayias via Guix-patches via writes: >>>> >>>> > Hello Guix, >>>> > >>>> > The mesa-updates branch I think is just almost ready for >>>> > merging. Besides some other fixes and updates, the main series is >>>> > tracked at . There is an update t= o >>>> > add NVK support to mesa for x86_64-linux which I need to review and >>>> > push (and rebase to get more fixes from master). >>>> > >>>> > Coverage looks good for x86_64 and i686 on QA, with powerpc64le as >>>> > well on Berlin. I worry that aarch64 and others may have stalled out >>>> > on Bordeaux. Perhaps Efraim can chime in there. >>>> > >>>> > With an update for NVK for x86_64, that will take maybe a day to cat= ch >>>> > up again in builds but tends to be pretty quick. I'm not aware of >>>> > other blockers. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks! >>>> > John >>>> >>>> maybe is time to merge? >>>> >>>> see >>>> ci have x86_64-linux 96.3%, i686-linux 87.7%, powerpc64le-linux = 85.5% >>>> bordeaux have x86_64-linux 91.5%, i686-linux 77.8%, armhf-linux >>>> 79.4%, aarch64-linux 89.0%. >>>> >>>> Is there anything else in the way? >>> >>> Comparing them against master and against each other: >>> x86_64: comparable on ci, slight regression on bordeaux >>> i686: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (91.8 -> 77.8) >>> aarch64: comparable on ci, regression on bordeaux (97.0 -> 89.0) >>> armhf: slight regression on bordeaux >>> ppc64le: comparable on ci and bordeaux >>> riscv64: regression on bordeaux (62.0 -> 28.2) >>> >>> I feel like bordeaux will catch-up fairly quickly post merge. However, >>> we do now have the regression page for bordeaux of master vs >>> mesa-updates: >>> >>> >>> However, after spot-checking a few of them to see if there are >>> substitutes (including gnome and openjdk) it looks like it probably jus= t >>> needs to be sent through again. >>> >>> It looks okay to me >> >> I had been keeping a close eye some weeks ago during the initial batch >> of patches I pushed and I also think everything looks good. I was just >> waiting for non-x86 substitute coverage which seems to finally be >> there as noted above after waiting for other branches and recent >> Berlin issues. I have been running my system on this branch for a >> couple weeks as well. >> >> However, the other day on IRC there was a comment about (if I >> remember) Sway hardware acceleration needing newer libva...? I think >> it was Josselin (cc'ed); apologies if I misremembered as I was >> traveling. >> >> Is that a blocker? If so, it would be good to have that update (plus >> likely yet another mesa version bump) so substitutes can be >> rebuilt. But I also don't want to hold up any other branches longer >> than necessary as this has already been waiting for some weeks. > > i think we can merge this branch first, and setup a new branch to fix/upd= ate > libva and mesa, people can use inferior to get have hardware > acceleration package on new branch. WDYT? > Yes, sounds good. I did a rebase and deleted/pushed to mesa-updates. I'll c= heck in about 12 hours and will do the merge assuming it still looks good a= nd no sudden issues. Ah, did find the log I missed about Sway, seems it will be for the new vers= ion . So, I will do t= he merge and then we can do a new branch for libva, sway, etc. (and keep up= with mesa). Probably will just put it in the queue once build slots open u= p as I would like to (every time) keep it small and quick to keep it from b= ecoming harder to manage. Thanks all! John