From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Python: enable the dbm module.
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:39:10 +0200
Message-ID: <87ppy71dyp.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zjxb4uoi.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1365274111-3589-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59636)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UOblb-0006A9-1u
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:39:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UOblY-0008It-R0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:39:23 -0400
Received: from [2a01:e0b:1:123:ca0a:a9ff:fe03:271e] (port=53440
	helo=xanadu.aquilenet.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UOblY-00083S-LX
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:39:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1365274111-3589-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> (Cyril
	Roelandt's message of "Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:48:31 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:

> On 04/06/2013 04:09 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> We also have bdb, so we can use it if that=E2=80=99s what is expected.
>
> Well, I managed to do this with the compatibility mode of gdbm.

Looks good (apparently Debian builds it against bdb, but using gdbm
sounds good: <http://packages.debian.org/sid/python2.7>.)

> Maybe this patch should be merged with the previous one. I think I'll sub=
mit it
> to Python.

Yes, even better.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/python-fix-dbm.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +--- setup.py	2013-04-06 00:53:37.000000000 +0200
> ++++ setup.py.new	2013-04-06 19:55:05.000000000 +0200
> +@@ -1158,10 +1158,14 @@
> +             for cand in dbm_order:

Can you add a comment at the beginning of the patch stating what it
does, and what its status is wrt. upstream?

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.