From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GCC front-ends Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87ppqpbl26.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wqlfutme.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87hacijnke.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppr4giie.fsf@karetnikov.org> <8738nzdig1.fsf@gnu.org> <87hacdmyc2.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <87bo2bkd7f.fsf@gnu.org> <20131027103944.GA8019@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VamXx-0004E4-JR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:07:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VamXr-0001rf-FR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:42801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VamXr-0001rV-8u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:07:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131027103944.GA8019@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:39:44 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:08:04PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> That=E2=80=99s a bug, which may have been fixed in 4.8.2 no? I=E2=80=99= d rather not >> workaround that if it=E2=80=99s been/being fixed. > > Speaking of which, should we maybe switch to 4.8.2 for building the > distribution? Now would be the right time to update core-updates. Yes, definitely. I wanted to test 4.8.2 in master first, but for that I was waiting for Nikita=E2=80=99s work to avoid any disruption. > Mark also suggested a new set of bootstrap-tarballs with a common date > and common versions of all programs for all architectures, including > mips. Probably a good idea. I wonder if this would also be an opportunity to do that fixed-point thing while we=E2=80=99re at rebuilding everything. Or is it too ambitious? Ludo=E2=80=99.