From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Mupen64Plus
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:28:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87pozfrxl2.fsf@T420.taylan>
References: <8737woawim.fsf@T420.taylan> <878u6bxegy.fsf@T420.taylan>
	<20151112144929.7732ef85@debian-netbook> <8737wbtgz7.fsf@T420.taylan>
	<87r3jvw5w2.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55523)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1Zwujy-0004cY-Tm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:28:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1Zwujt-00063f-9S
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:28:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r3jvw5w2.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 17:15:41 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribi=
s:
>
>> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:
>>
>>> On hydra Mupen64plus-core fails to build on arm and mips.
>>>
>>> Mips failure message:
>>> starting phase `build'
>>> Makefile:127: *** CPU type "mips64" not supported.  Please file bug rep=
ort at 'http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus/issues'.  Stop.
>>> phase `build' failed after 0.3 seconds
>>>
>>> Arm failure message:
>>> starting phase `build'
>>> Makefile:116: Architecture "armv7l" not officially supported.'
>
> [...]
>
>> I don't have any ARM machine on which I could investigate this issue,
>> so for now I'll just mark Mupen as only for i686 and x86_64.
>
> When adding a =E2=80=98supported-systems=E2=80=99 field, it=E2=80=99s bes=
t to add a comment
> above stating what evidence we have that some systems are not supported
> (in that case, that the top-level Makefile has a pre-defined list of
> supported architectures.)
>
> This helps others and your future self ;-) find out why this restriction
> is there and whether it still applies.
>
> Could you add such a comment?

Indeed, sorry about that.  Fixed. :-)

Taylan