From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables. Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:25:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87poygn0vq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <877fkwotnw.fsf@elephly.net> <87bna7g8a2.fsf@igalia.com> <87wpsvnqhe.fsf@elephly.net> <87k2oui80q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Opj-0003lZ-Hq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:26:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Opi-0004ry-Nn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:25:59 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k2oui80q.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> From 11f502281064525a067c1453cd2b7b663bf6c3bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Ricardo Wurmus >> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:32:06 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_PATH. >> >> * gnu/packages/patches/gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH: New file. >> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. >> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+) [source]: Add patch. >> [native-search-paths]: Add search path for GUIX_GTK3_PATH. > > LGTM. > > This will have to go to a separate branch. We’ll get Hydra to build it > once it’s done with the security updates. Could you push them to a new branch then? I have no control over what Hydra builds and I assume you’d want to rebase them on top of the security updates. > I agree with Andy that this needs to be discussed with upstream though. > Could you open a bug on their tracker and explain the problem and > proposed solution? Yes, I’ll take care of this. ~~ Ricardo