From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#23220: Users' home is not created when initializing with a LUKS /home Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:32:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87pou4wgdk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160405004849.GA22967@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anNMA-0003rN-Bg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:33:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anNM6-0005r1-BU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:33:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anNM6-0005qx-7g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1anNM6-0001Zu-2r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 05:33:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160405004849.GA22967@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:48:49 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: 23220@debbugs.gnu.org, request@debbugs.gnu.org merge 23220 21108 thanks Leo Famulari skribis: > When initializing a new GuixSD system with /home on an encrypted > partition (as described in the manual), unprivileged users' home > directories are not created. > > I initialized the system with the encrypted partition locked and > unmounted, but from #guix had the same problem even though > they had unlocked and mounted the partition. Right, see . > Of course, root can create the directories once the new system has > booted, but none of the configuration files are there, which means the > environment is not what is expected (my PATH was '/bin:/usr/bin'). In which case did you get this value of PATH? > I worked around the problem by removing my user from the operating > system configuration, reconfiguring, putting my user back in the > configuration, and reconfiguring again. Definitely not great. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.