From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 22:17:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87pot2zyjq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87vb3twtgi.fsf@gnu.org> <87egah85e4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a8l5xc9w.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpo6n8y5.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87futz5rqv.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9efcqid.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87bn4n5ngw.fsf@gnu.org> <87futylxk6.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41462)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <roel@gnu.org>) id 1axglv-0001kT-1N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:18:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <roel@gnu.org>) id 1axglf-0002yA-PQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 16:18:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <87futylxk6.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> I added your magic for Guile.  Here is the patch:
>>
>>>From 6221baadea331cff7e8ab6b9ea1b3bb7737b227f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
>> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 14:30:25 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/maths.scm (nlopt): New variable.
>
> Pushed with minor cosmetic changes, notably:
>
>> +    (source (origin
>> +      (method url-fetch)
>> +      (uri (string-append "http://ab-initio.mit.edu/nlopt/nlopt-"
>> +                          version ".tar.gz"))
>> +      (sha256
>> +       (base32 "12cfkkhcdf4zmb6h7y6qvvdvqjs2xf9sjpa3rl3bq76px4yn76c0"))))
>
> “(method” should be indented below the “r” of “origin” (I think this
> pattern also appears in the R patches you recently submitted.)
>
> Thank you!

I've been submitting most packages this way.  Should I align (method
...) to the r in origin for all packages in the future?

Thank you!

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen