From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/24] gnu: compression: Add snappy. Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:21:50 +0300 Message-ID: <87pop6pmnl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87h9ajqkw1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baHeE-0000UB-5B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baHe9-0006sY-VU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:53 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]:33320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1baHe9-0006sN-N3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 03:21:49 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id f93so1083824lfi.0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:21:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:27:51 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel David Craven (2016-08-17 22:27 +0300) wrote: >>> I don't believe you :-) >> >> Oh, that's embarrassing. I must have forgotten to change the hash and >> guix cached the tarball. Is that possible? > > Sorry about that. I make many stupid mistakes, but I'm not a liar... ;-) Oh, I didn't mean that! I just wanted to say that it works as expected, so you probably made some mistake. As for the hash, yes it's possible as Leo explained. -- Alex