From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Guile 2.2 packages
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:27:54 +0200
Message-ID: <87pood8lt1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87twdrlkjn.fsf@gnu.org> <20160907194527.7aecb308@scratchpost.org>
	<87zinjjv07.fsf@gnu.org> <20160907231522.2261a63a@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39122)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1biI6O-00005r-Ld
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:28:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1biI6J-0004M4-Lz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 05:28:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160907231522.2261a63a@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Wed, 7 Sep 2016 23:15:22 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 22:49:12 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>> I don=E2=80=99t know.
>
>>What you describe sounds a lot like a search path issue.
>
> It is a search path issue.
>
> Does package-for-guile-2.2 take it into account?
>
> Your E-mail contains:
>
> The following environment variable definitions may be needed:
>    export PATH=3D"foo/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH"
>    export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=3D"foo/share/guile/site/2.0${GUILE_LOAD_PATH:+:=
}$GUILE_LOAD_PATH"
>    export GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH=3D"foo/lib/guile/2.0/ccache:foo/share/=
guile/site/2.0${GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH:+:}$GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH"
>    export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=3D"foo/share/guile/site/2.2${GUILE_LOAD_PATH:+:=
}$GUILE_LOAD_PATH"
>    export GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH=3D"foo/lib/guile/2.2/ccache:foo/share/=
guile/site/2.2${GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH:+:}$GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH"
>
> This is setting the same environment variables twice, overwriting them.

Yes, but that=E2=80=99s fine.  However, the example I gave is ridiculous in=
 that
you can=E2=80=99t have guile@2 and guile-next in the same profile since you
can=E2=80=99t have two =E2=80=98guile=E2=80=99 programs in the same profile=
.  What you can do,
though, is have both guile-json and guile2.2-json in the same profile.

> I get (for a long time already, so it's not breakage introduced by your c=
ommit here):
>
> $ emacs
> ...
> open("/home/dannym/.guix-profile/lib/guile/2.0/ccache/ice-9/eval.go", O_R=
DONLY|O_CLOEXEC) =3D 6

This one was fixed by Alex Kost in
ca408580946d5a8be872f3da755112f5559a054d (in core-updates), and I pushed
a similar fix for 2.2 in master.

Hopefully that=E2=80=99ll solve this and similar issues.

Ludo=E2=80=99.