From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "ng0" <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Subject: Re: Add murmur.
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:15:38 +0000
Message-ID: <87poj1fw91.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <20170201204312.3005-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46918)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cZ2Fn-00081f-Rf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:15:48 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>) id 1cZ2Fj-0000o3-BB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:15:47 -0500
Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:62916)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>)
	id 1cZ2Fi-0000nM-UA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:15:43 -0500
Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated
	sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with
	ESMTPSA id 71BA62C0119
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed,  1 Feb 2017 21:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
In-reply-to: <20170201204312.3005-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org


contact.ng0@cryptolab.net writes:

> This patch adds an proposed change to mumble, murmur as an output.
> Murmur is the server of mumble. I tried to use an inherit package first, but the amount of code for the minor difference between mumble and murmur is not worth the length of a new package.
> I'm not sure it murmurd needs the "/lib" of output:out (mumble) at runtime,
> in the absence of a possibility to test this, we can onl figure out once a
> service for murmur is written.

Update:
I just ran murmurd and connected to myself (127.0.0.1) and
neither murmurd nor mumble client threw errors at me.
-- 
ng0 . https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/