From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Unrar package might contain proprietary code. Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 13:51:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87pohzx2nk.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87h93cn4ye.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170301202009.GA22689@jocasta.intra> <87fuiwn34o.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d1e0n18g.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170302055424.GA3674@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjQCu-0003Go-Er for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:51:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjQCt-0004vp-HB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:51:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <20170302055424.GA3674@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, John Darrington , Cl??ment Lassieur John Darrington writes: > I don't have any strong opinions here. But if somebody feels that we really cannot > have this program in Guix, then go ahead and revert it. > > In the meantime I will try to contact the authors and ask for clarification. However > since the project has been inactive for the last 13 years, I don't hold too much > hope of getting a reply. This appears to be free software (unlike the official unrar programme). I don’t think we need to remove it from Guix. ~~ Ricardo