From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#27467: Xfce broken, because it propagates two different versions of gtk+ Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87podm9932.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87tw36fert.fsf@netris.org> <874lv59hn7.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8z4ig01.fsf@netris.org> <87injjknkk.fsf@elephly.net> <878tke681f.fsf@gnu.org> <87shimdmtg.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2y5euec.fsf@elephly.net> <874lv15ysy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36935) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQaBu-0003Al-80 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:13:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQaBq-0002G5-2r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:13:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQaBp-0002Fd-W9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQaBp-0005pr-Rt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:13:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <874lv15ysy.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27467-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> What do you think of the attached patches? The first makes libxfce4ui >> only propagate the latest gtk+, so I added gtk+-2 where needed. The >> second removes “exo” from the “xfce” meta-package, because it doesn’t >> seem needed. “exo” propagates “gtk+-2”, so it would be hard to prevent >> the conflict otherwise. >> >> These patches are only a temporary fix until we can find a way to mark >> certain conflicts as unproblematic. > > These patches seem reasonable to me. > > Another option (perhaps slightly less intrusive) would be to implement > the ‘xfce’ meta-package using ‘union-build’ instead of > ‘propagated-inputs’. Yes, that’s better. I pushed two commits: gnu: libxfce4ui: Do not propagate gtk+-2. (b8d3a000efca885180277358caa3c4fe604168a5) gnu: xfce: Build union instead of propagating inputs. (c860d6ef235b47ec8181fbf390e0b42fbc95dcfe) With these two commits I can install xfce without problems. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net