From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCXO2-0001s6-5b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:28:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCXNy-0000R9-1Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:28:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fCXNx-0000R4-UL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:28:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fCXNx-0001vi-OI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:28:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31176] [bug#31178] [PATCH] gnu: Add inxi. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180416123830.28716-1-ambrevar@gmail.com> <87r2n6gbpg.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh7mr17w.fsf@gmail.com> <87in8ifqdc.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2n6qydr.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 23:27:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r2n6qydr.fsf@gmail.com> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2018 11:04:40 +0530") Message-ID: <87po2j81jn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 31178@debbugs.gnu.org, 31176@debbugs.gnu.org Oleg, could you take care of this patch? (See Pierre=E2=80=99s comments be= low.) Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Oleg Pykhalov writes: > >>> I didn't know Oleg was going to submit a patch, maybe there was some >>> confusion in the process :p >> >> I've mentioned it in our mailing list discussion, see >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2018-04/msg00130.html > > Sorry, I had completely missed the last line :) > >> If you are talking about 31176, then no, because I've used a wrapper to >> find all =E2=80=98inxi-minimal=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98inxi=E2=80=99 requis= ites. It was easy to do, >> because =E2=80=98inxi=E2=80=99 in 31176 is a Shell script, not a Perl sc= ript. Thanks to >> Chris Marusich for an idea. > > I think we can do the same thing for the Perl version. You want to give > it a try? > > If I understand correctly, relying on native-inputs would mean that if th= e user > runs `guix gc`, then all of inxi "optional" dependencies would go. > Is this correct?