Heya!

Clément Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> skribis:

> So that Cuirass specifications used to build 'guix-modular' can be named
> differently than "guix" and "guix-modular" (see Guix's
> build-aux/hydra/guix-modular.scm).
>
> The name is used as a primary key, so before that commit, it was also
> impossible to have several such specifications.

[...]

> diff --git a/bin/evaluate.in b/bin/evaluate.in
> index d973c44..86d0e83 100644
> --- a/bin/evaluate.in
> +++ b/bin/evaluate.in
> @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ exec ${GUILE:-@GUILE@} --no-auto-compile -e main -s "$0" "$@"
>  ;;;; evaluate -- convert a specification to a job list
>  ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2018 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
> -;;; Copyright © 2017 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
> +;;; Copyright © 2017, 2018 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
> +;;; Copyright © 2018 Clément Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
>  ;;;
>  ;;; This file is part of Cuirass.
>  ;;;
> @@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ building things during evaluation~%")
>                  (proc    (module-ref %user-module proc-name))
>                  (commit  (assq-ref spec #:current-commit))
>                  (name    (assq-ref spec #:name))
> -                (args    `((,(string->symbol name)
> +                (args    `((guix
>                              (revision . ,commit)
>                              (file-name . ,source))
>                             ,@(or (assq-ref spec #:arguments) '())))

If we do that, then everything is called ‘guix’.

Shouldn’t we instead change the schema along these lines?