From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxADf-0002bN-5O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 08:14:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxADa-0002Oh-7P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 08:14:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fxADa-0002Ob-37 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 08:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fxADZ-0002z0-TV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 08:14:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#32579] [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-mingw 2.2.3. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87sh2xrod8.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ciuvtv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhwyfea9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:12:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zhwyfea9.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2018 23:43:10 +0200") Message-ID: <87pnxtcvg9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 32579@debbugs.gnu.org Howdy! Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > Hi! > >>> I created a mingw32 cross build for guile-2.0 some time ago, expecting >>> to need it real soon for "work" or for LilyPond. Neither need >>> materialized until now; but it very soon. >>> >>> Luckily, I found that Mike Gran did quite some work this spring on their >>> wip-mingw-guile-2.2 branch; so I packaged the latest snapshot. >> >> Does that mean that Guile 2.2.5 will cross-build fine with >> --target=3Di686-w64-mingw32? (I thought this was already the case >> actually.) > > Well, if wip-mingw-guile-2.2 is merged; yes. I'm not sure why that > hasn't happened yet, so there may be issues? Good question! It could be that simply nobody took the time to look into it. If it can be chopped in small sizable chunks, I can take a look and cherry-pick from it. If you have suggestions or guidance, that=E2=80=99s very welcome! Regarding the package itself: I=E2=80=99m inclined to not include it in Guix proper and instead work on applying the fixes in =E2=80=98stable-2.2=E2=80= =99. Is it OK for you? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.