From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Vong Subject: Using =?utf-8?Q?'=CE=BB'?= Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:51:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87pnwerzyz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBFeY-0002bj-RW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 04:52:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBFeV-00009d-Kb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 04:52:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]:45528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBFeV-00006Y-Dr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 04:52:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id t70-v6so6905864pgd.12 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 01:52:03 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello guix, Should we allow the use of '=CE=BB' in guix? I think we have discussed it before, but I forget why it was rejected. Running 'rgrep' on source shows 7 uses of it. I think it is syntactically more pleasant and it encourges the use of short functions (at least for me!). Cheers, Alex --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQSof2ZdXkE0FM5aU4XzrkvbI+zaGwUCW8GyJAAKCRDzrkvbI+za G4tlAPkBhwzV5E2mi3djK5EdW9PjUWoS0NHaOXdZV/GBrB0ApAD+PkvN3+BrCrVm ySQMKtTEjiH3pSjZgRFTfWM2ufNHHwU= =2mVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--