From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3F8-0002ih-PD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:49:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3F4-00088N-Mn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:49:10 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3F1-00087Q-T1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:49:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3F0-0004CJ-8M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:49:03 -0400 Subject: [bug#32933] [PATCH] guix: add license prefix hackage imports Resent-Message-ID: References: <87h8hri9sj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7nioqk6.fsf@elephly.net> <877eijljkf.fsf@gnu.org> <87va63mthl.fsf@elephly.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:47:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnwbmid7.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Joe Hillenbrand Cc: 32933@debbugs.gnu.org Joe Hillenbrand writes: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 02:49 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> > >> > For the sake of consistency though, it may be best to do it for all the >> > importers, if we were to take that route. >> >> Adding the same prefix to all importers sounds good to me. >> > > Should I create a patch for each importer or do them all in one patch? Either way is fine. If you create one patch for all importers please make sure to list all the changes to the different files explicitly in the commit summary. Thank you! -- Ricardo