From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: bug#35542: Installer does not display full backtrace on error Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 18:14:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnoy42o7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20190503085927.ib5gudynudeknclm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87ef5fetnv.fsf@gnu.org> <8736lvka3k.fsf@gmail.com> <20190503174633.otzjizlfjhr4bkca@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87y33msgmy.fsf@gmail.com> <20190504122403.noe5hirk6u3qtmcm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190504145409.00768bf6@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxJW-0000at-W2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:15:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxJW-00039N-52 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:15:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxJW-00039I-1m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMxJV-0001TN-Rl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:15:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <20190504145409.00768bf6@scratchpost.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 35542@debbugs.gnu.org Hey, > ,use (system repl debug) ; or #:use-module (system repl debug) > (terminal-width 2000000) > > f.e. at the top of gnu/installer.scm Thanks for testing Florian. Based on Danny suggestion we could set COLUMNS to 200 to have a more verbose backtrace (like guix itself). Using higher values, the backtrace becomes really long and harder to read. WDYT? Mathieu