From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs.,
	bug#35588: [PATCH] ui: Search matches additional package outputs.
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 12:39:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87pnotz0un.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87r29czo6e.fsf@gmail.com> <20190505214153.32372-1-me@tobias.gr>
	<87bm0g6jbp.fsf@garuda.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87muk0kjxf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhnzxer9.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87r29czo6e.fsf@gmail.com> <20190505214153.32372-1-me@tobias.gr>
	<87bm0g6jbp.fsf@garuda.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87muk0kjxf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhnzxer9.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87mujy8yd8.fsf@gnu.org> <878svhv3re.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59666)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hOJzX-0007MH-LD
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:40:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hOJzW-0001iY-QP
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:40:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46854)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hOJzW-0001iO-Mt
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:40:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hOJzW-00024q-Ff
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2019 06:40:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35588.B35588.15573119957963@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <878svhv3re.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Tue, 07
	May 2019 23:50:29 -0700")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: 35588@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi!

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> In light of that, I've chosen to exclude all of the following outputs:
>
>   '("out" "doc" "debug" "lib" "static" "bin" "examples" "gui" "tests"
>     "utils" "include")
>
> I've also added a test to verify that package outputs are included in
> search results.

I would exclude only the standard output names used by (guix build
gnu-build-system), so:

  ("out" "doc" "debug" "lib" "include" "bin")

That way one can still do =E2=80=98guix search git gui=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=
=98guix search bind utils=E2=80=99.

> What do you all think of this latest version?

Thanks for the new test!  LGTM.

Ludo=E2=80=99.