From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: bug#38529: Make --ad-hoc the default for guix environment proposed deprecation mechanism Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:33:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87pngncc0n.fsf__35714.6715906978$1576589663$gmane$org@kyleam.com> References: <87eexeu8mo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k16vdise.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCzD-0007iT-9g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:34:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCzC-0005nA-BU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:34:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCzC-0005my-7O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:34:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ihCzC-0002fL-4D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 08:34:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits , Konrad Hinsen Cc: Guix-devel , 38529@debbugs.gnu.org G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > Konrad Hinsen ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2= 019. dec. > 17., Ke 7:52): [...] >> How about a more drastic measure: deprecate "guix environment" and >> introduce a new subcommand with the desired new behaviour? >> > That is also the other option I was thinking about. Do you have any good > idea in mind as how to call it? Of course the classic guix environment2 > comes to my mind, but it does not look very appealing to me. Perhaps "guix env"?