From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40121)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iwLdM-00076u-52
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:50:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iwLdL-0001Fl-9o
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:50:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53445)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iwLdL-0001Es-6d
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:50:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iwLdK-0005zx-9Z
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:50:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#39320] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-mwim.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39320.B39320.158019776523009@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <20200127235036.14809-1-mab@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:49:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20200127235036.14809-1-mab@gnu.org> (Amin Bandali's message of
 "Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:50:36 -0500")
Message-ID: <87pnf4m35y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Amin Bandali <mab@gnu.org>
Cc: 39320@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

Amin Bandali <mab@gnu.org> writes:

> +(define-public emacs-mwim
> +  (let ((commit "b4f3edb4c0fb8f8b71cecbf8095c2c25a8ffbf85")
> +        (revision "0"))
> +    (package
> +      (name "emacs-mwim")
> +      (version (git-version "0.4" revision commit))

Thank you for the patch.

Is there any particular reason to prefer this particular commit over
stable 0.4 release?

If so, it may be worth mentioning as a comment.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou