From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: bug#40538: installer: Support uvesafb to install on machines without KMS. Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:09:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnca9epo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200411184346.c3cgop7egcjyqzwf@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874ktpspr5.fsf@gnu.org> <20200412090257.jxljqbkwfhn7afnr@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200412112400.x4qufeztdnkmzqhx@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874ktooj3v.fsf@gmail.com> <20200412153052.ewxdd6m4f6yar2jw@pelzflorian.localdomain> <871roqlebf.fsf@gmail.com> <20200414081652.vjdu7d6w2u5piud4@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87h7xmz8dz.fsf@gnu.org> <20200414102838.n776paycpuy6kykx@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200414131404.gzashg4iyuyfdoua@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP4X-00053f-88 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:10:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP4W-0001BM-5l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:10:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP4U-0001Aj-Mn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:10:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jOP4U-0006IZ-HU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:10:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200414131404.gzashg4iyuyfdoua@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:14:04 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 40538@debbugs.gnu.org Hey Florian, > They do show that the uvesafb shepherd service was started, even when > it did not load uvesafb. Maybe the shepherd service should be > renamed. I did check on my recent hardware, the module is not loaded anymore and everything works fine. On my old Intel machine, I guess uvesafb was messing with i915, and as you pointed out, "nomodeset" was required. With your recent patch, uvesafb is not loaded and it works fine out of the box. Thanks a lot for all the effort your are investing into this :) Mathieu