From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSnop-0006US-HL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSnop-00071v-83 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:24:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSnoo-00071o-SU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSnoo-0005PX-P6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 16:24:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#39258] benchmark search: default vs v2 vs v3 Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87lfmi2qod.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 22:22:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Sun, 26 Apr 2020 19:01:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87pnbuyp25.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: zimoun Cc: Arun Isaac , Pierre Neidhardt , 39258@debbugs.gnu.org zimoun skribis: >> Could you do, for v2 and v3: >> >> time guix build /gnu/store/=E2=80=A6-package-metadata-cache.drv --check > > Newbie me! :-) > > Two points: > > 1. It may not be reproducible... I am checking. > 2. The time seems similar (v2=3D26s and v3=3D29s) considering the time > to start Guile and so on. Good, so it means that=E2=80=99s not Xapian taking time here. Thanks again! Ludo=E2=80=99.