From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: bug#35574: bcm5974 touchpad is not recognized as touchpad Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnbtwi2y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20190505065411.2rb5aqaaxywc4qvk@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20190505074152.ttmow2unsscdovhz@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200116233537.myczkgkwnfpn75hu@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200420144718.ehopbrz7hzvn5vxx@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200420155908.ulewy4c2vqkuzgfr@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200427002857.apq5nreio5kllpoq@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSxO3-0001Iw-AI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:37:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSxO2-000121-TB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:37:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSxO2-00011h-GU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:37:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jSxO2-0003dA-D1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:37:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200427002857.apq5nreio5kllpoq@pelzflorian.localdomain> (pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:28:57 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: 35574@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Florian, > I tested the patch with linux-libre 5.4 on various x86_64 machines and > I tested 5.4, 4.19 and 4.4 on my Macbook. I did not wait for > compilation to complete on non-Intel architectures, but I doubt the > patch causes problems. Thanks for fixing this! This seems like a reasonable choice. However, I noticed that on Ubuntu, CONFIG_USB_MOUSE is set to 'M'. So maybe they have some special udev/blacklist rules to handle this case? > I suppose this can go directly to master even though it requires the > linux-libre to be rebuilt? Yes, the kernel is frequently updated on master anyways. Thanks, Mathieu