From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GBTEMm3F9l92AwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:25:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id sGmZLm3F9l+cBwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:25:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5939403C8 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56474 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQbc-0005YI-22 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:25:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQbO-0005X3-Il for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:25:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQbO-0000Ke-Aw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQbO-0002y3-7T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45654: Building guile on x86_64 for aarch64 fails because of a missing guile Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45654 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Received: via spool by 45654-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45654.161000785811351 (code B ref 45654); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 45654) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2021 08:24:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQag-0002x0-HL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:24:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQae-0002wn-L9 for 45654@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:24:16 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQaY-0008M8-12; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:24:10 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=43770 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kxQaW-00042T-Gq; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 03:24:09 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <780E2538-D765-456F-9D81-FF1A9C9B3C13@vodafonemail.de> <87v9cami5j.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn2ikxc8.fsf@gnu.org> <97F6E0D3-9E54-4290-9743-03A275838F53@vodafonemail.de> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 18 =?UTF-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:24:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <97F6E0D3-9E54-4290-9743-03A275838F53@vodafonemail.de> (Stefan's message of "Wed, 6 Jan 2021 19:00:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87pn2hjgt5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45654@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.84 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1F5939403C8 X-Spam-Score: -2.84 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: HBmNyAOoM9Nr Hi, Stefan skribis: > There were no =E2=80=98--chroot-directory=E2=80=99 flags in my case. So I= wondered what is wrong and re-read the manual. I figured that I managed to= copy-paste the =E2=80=98wrong=E2=80=99 example code from the =E2=80=9CTran= sparent Emulation with QEMU=E2=80=9D section into my operating-system defin= ition, the first one. I was missing (guix-support? #t). Ah ha! > Would you accept a patch for the manual to contain (guix-support? #t) in = the first example as well? > > Actually I would even prefer a default change of =E2=80=98guix-support=E2= =80=99 to #t. Yeah, we should probably change the default to #t if nobody disagrees. The downsides I can see are: (1) changing defaults in general means breaking user assumptions, and (2) setting =E2=80=98guix-support?=E2=80=99 = means that the build environment is no longer completely hermetic (it contains extra store items), though it=E2=80=99s arguably still very much under cont= rol. Overall, it=E2=80=99s probably OK. Could you send a patch? > Would it also possible to print some proper error message, if guix build = is used with an unsupported =E2=80=98--system=E2=80=99 argum ent. I don=E2=80=99t think so: all we get is ENOENT from execve(2). There=E2=80= =99s no way to distinguish this kind of ENOENT from the other kind of ENOENT. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.