From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KAbKL9VPHmCuRAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:14:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id CJXSK9VPHmBxJAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:14:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8927B9402B1 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8IjM-0005hL-Fe for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:14:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8IjC-0005h8-OU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:14:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8IjC-0006fB-FA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:14:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8IjC-0005R1-9w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46145] [PATCH v2] gnu: jekyll: Update to 4.2.0 Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46145 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: EuAndreh Cc: 46145@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46145@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches--- via Received: via spool by 46145-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46145.161259923920855 (code B ref 46145); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 08:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 46145) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 08:13:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Ij9-0005QI-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:13:59 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:6997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Ij7-0005Q5-QU for 46145@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 03:13:58 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACE6E240007; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:13:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <46144@debbugs.gnu.org> <20210127225526.302-1-eu@euandre.org> <8735yaxmr8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sg6aywea.fsf@euandre.org> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 09:13:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87sg6aywea.fsf@euandre.org> (EuAndreh's message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:36:45 -0300") Message-ID: <87pn1dwr43.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8927B9402B1 X-Spam-Score: -2.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: RSul/OE5VDmd Hello, EuAndreh writes: > However, I think the removal of 'ruby-rouge-2' should be in together > with the update of Jekyll, as the existance of 'ruby-rouge-2' itself is > exclusively due to being an input to Jekyll. WDYT? Sounds good. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou