From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mPMpNnS8/mBB0wAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:45:24 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WOGtMXS8/mDpWAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:45:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E369E17B0E for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40480 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m80v3-0006gI-Sx for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:45:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m80uk-0006NQ-PB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:45:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m80uk-0006N9-G0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m80uk-0003ao-Fe for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49515: [core-updates] mescc-tools tests fail Resent-From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49515 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 49515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49515.162730704613731 (code B ref 49515); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 49515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2021 13:44:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50254 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m80tp-0003ZP-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:44:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m80tl-0003Yc-1B for 49515@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:44:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m80tf-0005IG-P4; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:43:55 -0400 Received: from [2001:980:1b4f:1:42d2:832d:bb59:862] (port=57102 helo=dundal.janneke.lilypond.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m80tf-00009C-ER; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:43:55 -0400 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <87k0lxafl6.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8az49ly.fsf@gnu.org> <87im16j4bo.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsw18fre.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:43:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fsw18fre.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:40:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmv5kx5y.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 49515@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1627307124; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=3u8H2DgzA87vDZqjTvD5Z46BBtgz7gS4ba0MxzrTJnA=; b=t0nJLgovJBzO6QpvwT71t1GB7WW/ewHiNu55yr2ic9mXBCI0spB7atjZkNCRabToMu7vzr GEAyy0tVNSRBQBUbOmzR3HuBTx/iI5uJbwlF3cDb8Z5et1+VBrK6pnM8QEjMTu2M7ahX7k BgjjoywLb+/tb5XDfpKYUVmFqjUT8lsFHg/wEreulV1Ppfqt2hjmkeZHyw0SmfYbU2j7oX LN3NQPN9UvCnvCNpNZxFEXYIWHjgVqO5EFxrZyxy6lpfRKZ49FSrWmuLP/dHWWe0b+w5xq y98ndqBueDsgHh6exVu6dMOqbLfurg+Dzp6VJbPknaip0SmRE+W13ILse+Cnyw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1627307124; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=B/1Dy4q5HX9rJ0iJsJ4BDQW5UQblpAIv92XdHqiZ3aAFWPyJAbKT07NAAXb5FosxaXICjg BHwo3ZoscY+U9PxNRuXKKKP11ic9ubILLUJCGEm/saRRJUXyEkAKz3wlh75IELvAKUzNCP +O6i6udBtaN7Jph7y9zc7kegnDl30moFBn9NejHpdZt+moXVzsrMlX8eDum127nHSF9waV eOPadfmlZ4EG5z1t00nqW2/dNJKefo9cewMA0KHvvgLxI65Pz90mhBFlIiIqNChXHEaM0S PSclavfCzfMyNxAPuMNclzb5h3y1bUNM43GvlA4k9ARwu/Fe3+hSqVANn7KvkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.92 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E369E17B0E X-Spam-Score: -2.92 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: QYFTiZV59MZl Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: Hi Ludo! > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >>> Should we upgrade instead? If we do, what=E2=80=99s the potential for = breakage? >>> Should =E2=80=98mes-rb5=E2=80=99 be kept on an older version? >> >> We could try that, I really can't tell if upgrading to 1.1.0 creates >> a different mes binary. > > I took this route and everything went well, and we can now build > =E2=80=98bootstrap-tarballs=E2=80=99 on x86_64-linux. I ended up doing a= dditional > changes: > > e2690a8eb2 gnu: mes-rb5: Remove. > da32015db0 gnu: mes-minimal-stripped: Explicitly disallow references. > 5510e1c483 gnu: mes: Remove 0.19. > 81096caf7d gnu: mes: Switch to Guile 3.0. > 114a9f1f80 gnu: mescc-tools: Update to 1.2.0. > 0b9da8b5a2 gnu: m2-planet: Update to 1.8.0. > 8b627a7701 gnu: mes-minimal: Remove unused variable. > Removing =E2=80=98mes-rb5=E2=80=99 was a bit disheartening but I guess it= =E2=80=99d have to be > updated to the current tool versions. Yeah, a bit sad but OK I guess. > I removed Mes 0.19 because it failed to build with Guile 3.0 and didn=E2= =80=99t > appear to be needed any longer. > > Let me know if you think I did anything wrong! LGTM! Greetings, Janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com