From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id MH6KCOMa72X3cAAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:23 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MH6KCOMa72X3cAAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:23 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PzCo7Ynb; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1710168802; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=GbSzVxgIFGQJSC0YV31OvRbavPGBGWVQres7RWQusE8=; b=KkIUlzhHCzM6RSATLpKV+lF/OJBebdlp2n+OTgiYu9A+O6MnxMQgYde6yJfoyLOSQ5orcS W3LrvLh5GoYYmOVZIwsaPOVsOIjXslcHLaTv7XVzkmlkI0xhbXSj7DcK3QI2ivKJ0gBRs9 6DK9FExexPkFSCBpJcW8Yk/6eAjibw/2+5KoRXEP3U1QOy/VGuoKTzQhaD+Fw0trUBXwUR Ro9GauC22IiZNCR9kibAQJlVsnJVl2ymgtVuIfcNpzef0PUt722NBBpfch+IGT5jqOqEo9 s+dPuqqTVbfN005e9bYEJcTP2ZM4mpQRG8pJs+5nj4W5VzHc1+t9pMCwsfy4VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PzCo7Ynb; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1710168802; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jEFfLRwXEBVH597BHDAzi/XnTVzXy5pORKtm2WsmwccgjvnxjXAnPMfaUY/vfW3CwAh3zk qVyB6yns0HEgDkqJJt8fiZ1QQKDP43p9P5pxFk0JaEPJYNuwtUIHoR4iROLdSs+NqFoFp6 V0ZhJ0l3zgjdyFOu64e3x2T+Jz0M3lTJmSv2UojlTjb1obcUogmnmY5DdGrNOvJZMrueid EvLN3AaCAX7mbmu1ON/0TpsImWc+ram7Bag8JrB3EAJlY1BfdY4pw+UDQwTxrriBS0ui6J c3FsspntECHrzYA0yMs1+qmWxg65LuFK0itYXloorzy0Cl1KSiaQKMKfQdUnHg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8892675BC for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh14-0005SE-0r; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh0y-0005P9-RU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh0k-0005JH-0G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:25 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33e9115d501so458775f8f.0 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710168731; x=1710773531; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GbSzVxgIFGQJSC0YV31OvRbavPGBGWVQres7RWQusE8=; b=PzCo7YnbML+HcfYagEVTyjDrSIv/0nax7n0sG7cauZfNeTKQQ5eE4SK5VtE6tmE26j BamSasnL6cFtgNzcrlOnzbD/HX1/yZTxgXR6ABZIZFk3ilDzC3VgJY4IkrMeaaWqiENh FzEpj/DaYF0sSoru9GCOjKida2NAJ35A5fbJFfKWvFU+3Z3iT+qtJxPN6wNsMTyk5e6j UDmaQi1HbKsH88lS+7fjNePNrtDIf51waYC98e51uP6w9BmFDSIfOGsiibWfsezV1PXJ gsymeCW5zf+cJEM/AW4Khjb55iXB4ZYuuaQk1vWIWgNT2SQe80AdJ4D3fN9N0+lMbpK9 OIdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710168731; x=1710773531; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GbSzVxgIFGQJSC0YV31OvRbavPGBGWVQres7RWQusE8=; b=Hrob0Fkjv4ZFZs1bgzdtUMclOHSmC37piGYZrDL9OQ90CsCFWI8De5ZxyXldCQesJE nsIzYqP+RJhYB/ReTEDZzARUvVckRfwOv8IJSEcjs3P81ksYl9M7Gl+euQ7sH7U6PLga ziUYteOViXdjCNjbY4w95jox3wX6gBmwaar53H56hgqzqKpa5LjXlwWZMCMSeXT4Y1X6 0MaO3MkQklgeP4KfKKzF6Kpt2mP/OIfJ7AvJl8eOHWPvmstswfzAZgZplQR6kv9HQUb7 G/bjKH1HOgqUXKqvOBswjSSjoaEhG9Ij1k3aDZOSEIVSBuPMS4jUHDCcldbWYNcmWpLP PnQw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVWt8DId8VBVCk1PcZoz5dEBlfEmEY/4XHWdRqnkzZosR8RpVmDAXZd5kEHmwlbeFwPYPMTxBh1lR61uuHLpucRIEk= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyZTA/8oX/AwnLaGqvLKKpX2ue/z3LCGvbcNCl88gnc4Jy1vivy MHGkOTZNN6tcZjcdg3x2IZ7n+iCsHInXd8vTkQqL9csutc/1EAKl6/mIfTWH X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESuooYrZDHENahO4zODK6xEa+PtCXEPBbC9BH6uQJv7cPrZ3IyiJ0kvZp2uTMTZPglokWIlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5107:b0:412:ebfe:6891 with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c510700b00412ebfe6891mr5111370wms.4.1710168731440; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-45.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [194.254.61.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ea13-20020a05600c674d00b004132ae838absm2897535wmb.43.2024.03.11.07.52.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier To: Greg Hogan , guix-devel Subject: Re: Helping with abandoned patches In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 18:51:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87plw47gtd.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.56 X-Spam-Score: -5.56 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E8892675BC X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: HXJxu9jFUXGo Hi Greg, On mer., 17 janv. 2024 at 12:17, Greg Hogan wrote: > What is the preferred process for when a patch review is provided > (often by a committer) but no response is received from the submitter > (for many weeks or months)? > > Is it appropriate to make the recommended changes and submit an updated patch? Yes because the aim is to improve the code so the review is not lost. Moreover, in that case of no response after a delay, if the reviewer does not have commit access, the best (more helpful) seems sending by the reviewer or anyone else a new version including the recommended changes. Cheers, simon